Win rate, time spent per stage, and dollars pursued, drawn from your own pipeline history rather than industry averages.
Analytics is the record-keeping layer underneath the rest of the platform. Every stage change, submission, award, and decline that moves through the Pipeline and CRM system leaves a data point, and Analytics aggregates those data points into reports that describe what actually happened rather than what staff remember happening.
Win rate is reported broken down by funder type, program area, and dollar range, calculated from the organization's own submitted applications rather than an industry benchmark. An organization that has applied to fifteen foundation grants and three federal awards over a year can see its award rate for each category separately, which is a more useful signal than a single blended number or an external average that has nothing to do with its actual funders.
Time-in-stage reporting shows how long applications typically sit in each pipeline stage before moving to the next one. If applications consistently stall for weeks at the drafting stage before moving to submission, that pattern becomes visible in the report rather than remaining a vague sense that things take too long. The same applies to dollars pursued against dollars awarded over a selected period, which gives a concrete return figure rather than an anecdotal one.
Funder performance history accumulates the same way: for any funder the organization has submitted to more than once, the report shows the pattern of outcomes over time, which is useful context before deciding whether to invest more staff time in that relationship.
Analytics does not make a recommendation or take an action based on what it reports. It aggregates and presents figures drawn from the organization's own history. Whether to shift focus toward a higher-performing funder category, reassign workload, or investigate a stage that consistently causes delay is a decision made by staff looking at the report, not by the system itself.